Leaders at COP28 emphasized the pivotal role of nature-based solutions (NbS) in addressing the climate crisis, highlighting its significance in establishing resilient food systems and preserving oceans. However, these discussions often neglect examinations of institutional power dynamics embedded in these agendas, leading to NbS without true free, prior, and informed consent agreements with communities. Integration of technological innovation into these conversations poses a genuine risk of NbS perpetuating exploitative practices if not thoughtfully implemented. In this brief, we address the risks associated with technology-enabled NbS solutions, such as epistemic injustice and the commodification of nature. In the context of low and middle-income countries in Asia, the absence of strong human rights and regulatory frameworks on land tenure has led to displacement and fueled discrimination and oppression of Indigenous Peoples and marginalised resource-dependent communities. While technological solutions are hailed as a panacea in the pursuit of NbS, these will play out in the context of digital divides, driving the concentration of power in the hands of a few actors. By unpacking the dynamics at play, we urge a nuanced understanding of technology’s potential within the context of preserving and restoring our natural environment. The brief presents a set of recommendations for policymakers, advocating for a cautious approach in investing in these solutions, informed by self-determination and reciprocity. Introduction In recent years, Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have received renewed global attention. In the context of Asian countries, including members of the G20, threats to biodiversity make interest in NbS especially crucial. The Indo-China hotspot is one of the richest biodiverse regions in the world, yet the expansion of human activities is threatening its critical biodiversity. Urgent action is needed to address this biodiversity crisis and build climate resilience. Technology is being leveraged to further NbS in Asia. This brief discusses this intersection and the risks and limitations of current technology-enabled approaches to NbS. We then recommend an approach underscored by the principles of self- determination and reciprocity.
Register for Updates
Would you like to receive updates on the Global Solutions Initiative, upcoming events, G7 and G20-related developments and the future of multilateralism? Then subscribe here!
1 You hereby agree that the personal data provided may be used for the purpose of updates on the Global Solutions Initiative by the Global Solutions Initiative Foundation gemeinnützige GmbH. Your consent is revocable at any time (by e-mail to contact@global-solutions-initiative.org or to the contact data given in the imprint). The update is sent in accordance with the privacy policy and to advertise the Global Solutions Initiative’s own products and services.